Man Vs Woman Essays - Sexual Acts, Human Sexuality,

Man Vs Woman Women vs. Man Physical, psychological, and sexually women and men are different. Physically the most recognized difference between the two sexies is that men have a penis and women have a vagina. Most men also have smaller breast. Men also have different body structures than women. Women have big hips in order to give birth and men have one less rib then women, but women cant complain about this because they gave that rib to us. Men and women also have different facial features. Along with looking different men and women think different too. This makes them different psychologically. The psychological differences start at an early age. Little boys are more likely to play with trucks and little girls are more likely to play with dolls. Some say that this is sexist parenting. For example, parents will give a little boy a truck before they will give him a doll or they will give their little girl a doll before they will give her a truck. This is not true. Scientists have found that if a girl has a cho ice between playing with a doll and playing with a truck, the girl will most likely play with the truck. And if a boy has a choice between playing with a truck or with a doll he is most likely going to pick the truck. Of course there are exceptions to this rule, there are some cases where either the male or female child likes to play with the opposite toys. For example a girl may play with truck while a little boy will play with a doll. The term for having both female and male characteristics, like stated in the example, is androgyny or more commonly called tom boy or tom girl. Another difference between the two sexes is that males are more aggressive. When they play they like to make GI Joes beat each other up or they like to wrestle. Boys want to be warriors. Studies have shown that females arent this aggressive. When girls play they are more concerned about what the dolls are doing, and how the others that they are playing with are feeling. In other words boys just want to play w hile girls want to know what you are thinking and how you feel. Women are born nurturers they also notice more details then men. Men seem to not care about details. For example, my husband doesnt read the instructions on how to put any thing together until he has, unsuccessfully, tried to put it together all weekend. Men also wont ask for directions until they have driven past the same gas station fifty times and even then if there is a women in the car she goes in and asks for the directions, but this is what makes men so lovable and funny. Men wont ask for directions and women will because they communicate in different ways. There are many gender differences when it comes to communication. Women are more skilled at reading nonverbal cues, such as body language. Researchers have found that women are more likely than men to inquire about upsetting situations that another person is in, and to use comforting messages that acknowledge the feelings of that person. When men get together with other men they are more likely to talk about cars or sports than their hair or what they did that day. Whereas, women would rather talk about their feeling or what they were thinking about than of sports or cars. It is also proven that men interrupt more than women do. Researchers also found out that women talking to women are more likely to tell their personal business than men talking to men, but if a man is talking to a woman that he is convertible with, he is capable of being just as self-disclosing as a woman would be. This is he will began to talk about his feelings or his personal business. Although women and men communicate so differently they understand each other, most of the time. Humans are the only species that communicate the way we do. Along with looking different, thinking different and then communication different males and females are also different when

Death Thomas Nagel

Death Thomas Nagel In his essay on â€Å"Death†, Thomas Nagel analyzes the issue of death and how people think of it. He examines if people are afraid of it and why, as well as what specifically it is and what sort of condition it brings about.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on â€Å"Death† Thomas Nagel specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More First of all, Nagel defines what death is and what characteristics he will be attributing to this state. He decides to look at death as becoming a state of non-existence without further immortal continuation of life, individual or soul. This point is extremely valid because many people believe that death brings about a darkness that is not followed by anything. Usually, these are people who do not believe in God and do not follow any religion, as all religions suppose continuation of life in another form. Thomas Nagel’s point is rather valid, as it looks at one possible condition. No o ne has been able to prove or show that there is some form of existence after death, so it would be logical and reasonable to examine all possible outcomes. Nagel goes on to say that death is not welcomed by most people, as it deprives an individual of all the enjoyable things in life but also of life itself. Even if all the bad things are considered, people still prefer to be alive than not. Thomas Nagel mentions that even if all the good and bad qualities of life are taken away and life is viewed as being neutral, people would still choose life. This is very true because people prefer life to anything else. No one is aware of what will follow and this lack of knowledge and uncontrollable imagination creates pictures that are both positive and negative. No matter how much a person tries to imagine Heaven or another beautiful world, the conscious mind still reminds about the chance for suffering or total darkness. Everyone has respect and feelings towards their personality and when t hey think that it will disappear they feel sad and sorry for themselves. A counterargument made by Nagel to this, is that before people are born there is also non-existence and total darkness but people are not afraid of that. This happens because a person is not able to have imagination and reasoning prior to being born and the darkness that was before they came to life they do not remember. In a way, it can be seen as a positive darkness because it leads to life and existence, whereas death will lead to absence of life and non-existence. Nagel compares this to create a perspective in people, â€Å"If death is a disadvantage, it is not easy to say when a man suffers it (Nagel, 3), hoping they realize that absence of feelings, imagination and ability to realize this absence is not evil or fearful.Advertising Looking for essay on philosophy? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Another major point Nagel discusses is the h uman perception and understanding of what is good or bad in life. He gives an example of a person who has suffered brain damage and returned to a state of a 3 month old infant. The fact that the brain is unable to realize the loss of intellect means that the individual does not really suffer. Everyone else, his friends and relatives, suffer due to the fact that the person who existed before is no longer in existence. This makes pleasures and suffering very relational to personal circumstances and time. Nagel then leads into the argument about the quality of a feeling that a person will have if they compare the â€Å"negative† aspects of being deprived of life by death, to the time before birth and what was the future person deprived off. â€Å"I confess to being troubled by the above argument, on the ground that it is too sophisticated to explain the simple difference between our attitudes to prenatal and posthumous nonexistence† (Nagel, 8). The human inability to imag ine what it would be like to lack consciousness and a state where an individual is deprived of all â€Å"benefits† of life is what limits the possibility of answering to this paradox. The life a person experiences is defined and framed by what they feel and see. Someone who was born blind would not truly feel deprivation of sight, if all the conditions for their comfortable existence were created. They would not be able to compare what sort of stimuli and visual experiences they have lost, so the fact that other people have the ability to see, would not truly life determining. Thomas Nagel ends with a comparison between a person dying at a young and of old age. The deprivation of future possible experiences and life is what is most devastating. The fact that a person might go on living, thus receiving more positive and negative sensations, is a reality everyone strives towards. But then, the difference in perspective reencounters with a personal experience, in relation to an individual’s understanding of time, good and evil and existence. Nagel ends saying that: â€Å"if there is no limit to the amount of life that it would be good to have, then it may be that a bad end is in store for us all† (Nagel, 10). In a way, this contradicts his above reasoning that if there is no one to experience the loss of good life, then the absence of suffering and realization is not bad at all.